| Palm Springs View Estates | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() Lease or Buy? |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
» Home » News » News Archive » Published News Items » Commentary » Q&A/FactSheet » Timeline » Meetings » Legal & Legislative » Market Data |
Introduction This section presents
information to help PSVE residents compare the financial alternatives open
to them if the park is converted to condominium
ownership. Obviously, owners will have additional non-financial
considerations to influence their decision. Thus, ownership consists of the right to use the surface of a defined portion of land. It does not include the land itself as is usually the case in fee simple residential ownership. For this reason, wherever the term "lot" is used it actually means "manufactured home, or mobilehome, space." Management and operation of the park As a tenant-in-common, all buyers will also acquire an undivided interest in and the associated responsibilities for the park common area. Common area includes the entire park, except the manufactured home spaces, including those that have been purchased by residents and those that are still owned by the park owner. This form of ownership has a number of implications that park residents must consider when evaluating the pros and cons of purchasing. The space owner’s fractional ownership of the common area carries the responsibility for park operation, maintenance, repairs and any improvements. This is accomplished via a Homeowners’ Association (HOA). The common area includes the park infrastructure, such as streets, grounds, pools, clubhouse and private utility systems, everything except the spaces, but including the land and utility systems under the spaces. After a majority (51%) of the spaces have been sold, the common area will be financed, operated and managed by the Homeowners’ Association (HOA), with each space owner (association member) having one voting right. (According to the proposed draft CC&R’s, the spaces owned by the park owner will have three votes each.) Until a majority of homeowners is reached, the park owner will continue to control the management of the park. Financial reserves for operation and maintenance of the common areas will be funded by the park subdivider (owner) prior to approval of the project. The monthly HOA fees and reserve amounts will be established by the State Department of Real Estate based on estimated current and future requirements.
Implications of HOA membership
It should be noted the PSVE park includes streets and private
utility systems that have been in service without major improvement for
nearly forty years. Park residents that do not purchase and continue to rent their spaces will not be required to participate in the funding of the HOA. The park owner-investors will continue to own the rented spaces and will have to pay the monthly HOA fees and cover the cost of any special assessments. The only way they can recover these costs is from the space rental amounts they receive. The current state conversion codes limit increases for renters with low-income status for as long as they own their coach. When the coach changes hands, rent control is eliminated. For non-low-income renters, after a four-year market rate adjustment period, rents are no longer controlled so they could then be increased to any level. All rental income goes to the space owners, none to the HOA. This means that the cost of operating and maintaining the park, including any special assessments for extraordinary repairs, will be borne exclusively by HOA members. For the non-low-income homeowners that continue to rent, the park owner-investor HOA members will have the ability to increase rents on the lots they still own to whatever level they wish after the 4-year adjustment period. It will be very important at the outset, therefore, for those homeowners to negotiate acceptable lease terms that will run beyond the 4-year period. Will the park owner-investors negotiate acceptable lease terms? The conversion code overrules local rent control for low-income homeowners with state mandated provisions that are eliminated when the coach changes ownership. The law eliminates rent control for the low-income renters over time. Considering the age of most homeowners and the mobility rate of Californians in general, the time could be rather short. After the 4-year adjustment period to market rents, government rent control for non-low-income homeowners is completely eliminated, leaving any rent increase protection up to the homeowner's ability to negotiate acceptable terms. Since the legislative activity on park owner-initiated conversions in recent years has tried to focus on preventing so-called "sham" conversions by park owners to eliminate local rent control, the park owner-investors are somewhat legally obligated to show some measure of good faith by agreeing to acceptable lease terms. Onerous lease terms could be a clear indication of a "sham" conversion and expose them to court action. Also, the condition of the park could deteriorate, with vacant lots and abandoned coaches. This would have a negative effect on the value of mobile homes and lots in the competitive marketplace. Comparing options for all residents When deciding whether to purchase or continue renting, it will be important to compare what the actual costs and benefits would be for each option. Refer to input criteria following charts.
From an investment viewpoint, it will be important to compare the following:
Mobile
home net sale prices |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© Copyright © 2005. Revised: February 21, 2008